Comments on: The 1985 Bears vs. 2007 Patriots

By: SC Dave

SC Dave — Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:15:35 +0000

Oh please. The 1985 Bears defense was orders of magnitude better than the 2007 Giants. Brady would not live through the game.

Bears 35, Patriots 7

By: Samurai mike

Samurai mike — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:12:22 +0000

Ofc the 1985 bears would win just take a look at the giants vs patriots game. The giants beat the pats by good pass rushing and good running the ball. The 1985 bears hade the best pass rush in nfl history “80sacks” in a nlf season, and they hade wa

By: Ryan Hall

Ryan Hall — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:14:37 +0000

Its pretty obvious the ‘85 Bears would defeat the Patriots. The Bears were tough and played very fast, destroying offensive lines, and quarterbacks. In addition, don’t forget the “sack man” Dent. He’d keep Brady on his back all 60 minutes. Bears 20 Pats 14.

By: Da Bears

Da Bears — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:36:20 +0000

Well the Giants just beat the Pats 17-14.
Seems the best way to beat the Pats is to play tough defense, keep Brady off the field, pressure brady, run the ball and keep time of possession. This is what the 1985 bears did very well. Add Walter Payton, one of the best running backs ever, and Tom can’t do much looking from the sidelines.

History proved again, defense wins the big one.
18-1 baby.

By: Brian Close

Brian Close — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:03:17 +0000

Now we know: the Patriots could not stand up to a pressure defense. The 2007 Giants have only one starter on the defensive line that could have started for the 85 Bears: Strahan. The Bears linebacking core was superior to the Giants. And offensively the Bears were a better team than the Giants. So 85 Bears over 07 Giants over 07 Pats

By: austin personal trainers

austin personal trainers — Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:48:24 +0000

My pick - 1985 Bears vs. 2007 New England Patriots -

PATRIOTS - 24
BEARS - 20

By: Mike Daly

Mike Daly — Mon, 28 Jan 2008 04:21:54 +0000

My pick - 1985 Bears vs. 2007 New England Patriots -

PATRIOTS - 49
BEARS - 46

By: Michael Daly

Michael Daly — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:37:31 +0000

To add to Bill’s point about the quality of the league picking up after the 1972 Dolphins season - there were several rule changes for 1974 to boost scoring, notably changes on kickoffs that, as NFL Films’ 1974 season review film put it, suddenly made special teams a legitimate offensive weapon.

It’s also interesting that in that 1974 season a players strike hit during preseason before being settled for the regular season. For the Patriots a lot of new names got in a lot of training camp work as Chuck Fairbanks installed what was then called the Oklahoma defense but which is now known as the 3-4.

By: Michael Daly

Michael Daly — Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:33:11 +0000

The comparison of Tony Eason to Drew Bledsoe doesn’t work because Bledsoe was much tougher, read defenses better, and was a better passer. Tony Eason could never have pulled off wins like the overtime wins over Miami in 1993 and Minnesota in 1994 nor last-minute wins over Miami and Buffalo in 1998 with a broken finger on his throwing hand.

What jumped out at me watching the reair of that game was that the Bears’ D wasn’t that good against kick returns (Stefan Starring kept making good returns) and looked shaky against the pass - Grogan was throwing the ball pretty well but no one was catching it. The 2007 Patriots would shred that 46 defense of the Bears.

Here’s a telling stat - the Patriots have won five of the subsequent six meetings with the Bears after Superbowl XX, including a 33-30 comeback win in 2002 after being down 27-6 in the third as well as that back-and-forth shootout in Gillette Stadium’s debut of Fieldturf.

By: Bill Burt

Bill Burt — Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:15:51 +0000

I would say these Patriots. But I have to say, the Dolphins were a gritty team. The only difference is I believe that was one of the weaker eras of the modern NFL. It started to pick up steam in the mid-70s with the Steelers and Raiders joining the Cowboys.