Comments on: Trade talk: Would you deal Ellsbury, Buchholz for Santana?

By: ret

ret — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 01:10:57 +0000

How about Crisp, Lester and Hansen for Santana?

By: Dawn

Dawn — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:56:26 +0000

(in addendum to the above comment):
*Especially* with the likelihood that 2008 will be Schill’s last year pitching, and we’ll be looking to fill a spot.

By: Dawn

Dawn — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:55:25 +0000

Oh my heck, NO. Santana, while talented, did not do all that much to impress me in 2007. Certainly not to the point that I would offer up Ellsbury & the cream of our rookie pitching crop! I agree with Patrick MacKenzie: wait til Santana becomes a free agent & make a play for him then, without giving up any of the young homegrown talent!

By: Patrick MacKenzie

Patrick MacKenzie — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 17:54:01 +0000

Absolutely not. I don’t understand why anyone is even remotely interested in this idea. Think about it: Santana is a free agent at the end of next season. Why not keep Buchholz, Ellsbury, Lester AND add Santana after the season, thereby keeping them all?

By: k

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:35:04 +0000

Buchholz would be in the trade and therefore not in the rotation.