Posts
Comments

It says here Curt Schilling is a Hall of Fame pitcher, though 35 wins between this year and next, would probably seal the deal.

I’ve said this before and I’ll say it ad infinitim: Schilling is reason No. 1 the Red Sox were the team they were in 2004, and I’m not just referring to the herculian effort with the stitched tendon. The team followed his lead when it came to being fearless against the Yankees.

His charitable work is extraordinary. Whether is Lou Gehrig’s disease, melanoma or a kid from Brockton with cancer, Schilling always seems to be going to bat for someone in anguish. We really need more professional athletes like him.

Now the rest of the story …

It seems every season he has been here in Boston, he has stolen headlines for something he has said.

Here we are, hours after Daisuke Matsuzaka pitches probably his most impressive outing, and everyone is still consumed with Schilling’s statement about Barry Bonds and his pursuit of 755.

I realize he later apologized for his comments on WEEI, but what would make him bring up Bonds’ cheating on his wife and taxes? Is Bonds on the only ballplayer to have cheated on his wife?

And taxes? Are you kidding me?

What does that have to do with baseball’s home run record?

The worst part of Schilling’s miscue is now, nobody will discuss Bonds. It will be “no comment,” which is too bad. There is nothing wrong with voicing disapproval over what he is about to do. In fact, I’m at the front of the line. But because of Schilling, any “respectable” truth about Bonds is taboo.

If you have anything you’d like to add this issue, before we get back to sports and baseball, please do.

  • Greg Greenwell

    While it is nice that sports writers have already decided that Hank Aaron is a perfect god and worthy of his home run record, it seems to me that his era (and mine) was in the rampant “greenies” rage times in baseball. So now that the sports writers have “decided” that Barry Bonds isn’t worthy of any records because he may have taken drugs to enhance his proformance in the era of “muscles for millions” of dollars. We should step back before we claim he isn’t worthy or Hank or Babe’s fame. Bonds may not be liked for his arrogance and his presence but his accomplishments aren’t any more tainted then the people before and after him. Alcohol was a mainstay for Babe’s era. Hank’s era had greenies, Barry’s era has steroids. But they all could swing a Bat against the best of their times. No drug can do that. Complain all you want but the facts are all three guys deserve recognition for their accomplishments. I am not a Barry fan but at least I don’t bash him for what his whole “era” in baseball became.

  • Bill

    Bill, you miss the point on Curt’s comments. People were outraged over the unsubstantiated statements he made about Bonds’ wife and financial position, not the steroid usage. It has been pretty universally accepted that he used illegal performance-enhancers.

    To the comment made above, explain to me how alcohol and “greenies” can help build muscle and speed up recovery time from injuries. If that’s the case I guess Ken Caminitti should have been pounding Budweisers instead of shooting up steroids-least he’d be alive today.

blog comments powered by Disqus