<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clement update</title>
	<link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2007/02/23/clement-update/</link>
	<description>Bill Burt's blog on sports</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2007/02/23/clement-update/#comment-179</link>
		<author>Anonymous</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2007/02/23/clement-update/#comment-179</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Rob, &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;In a previous blog entry, regarding the Schilling situation... you said:&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;I&gt;"and if they have to sign him for a few million more for one year than they probably view it as worth it to get a better gauge on his effectiveness going forward."&lt;/I&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Here's the problem.  If he pitches that well, he will be in great position to get a &lt;B&gt;multi-year&lt;/B&gt; deal from someone. At least 2 years, and in today's market, maybe some crazy GM goes 3 years if he pitches that well.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Basically, if Curt Schilling pitches well, he will very likely have multiple multi-year offers on the table in free agency. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I would love it if you could ask someone in the front office about that possibility.  Because you know very well Rob, that the Red Sox aren't going to give him a multi-year deal.  I want to hear someone in the Red Sox org say they'd be open to a multi-year deal.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Everyone seems to be assuming that Schilling will just want (or accept) a 1-year deal after the season.  It's time for you to start bringing attention to the possibility of several multi-year offers that will certainly exist if Schilling pitches well.... and if the Red Sox will go there. (which we know they won't)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, </p>
<p>In a previous blog entry, regarding the Schilling situation&#8230; you said:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;and if they have to sign him for a few million more for one year than they probably view it as worth it to get a better gauge on his effectiveness going forward.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the problem.  If he pitches that well, he will be in great position to get a <b>multi-year</b> deal from someone. At least 2 years, and in today&#8217;s market, maybe some crazy GM goes 3 years if he pitches that well.</p>
<p>Basically, if Curt Schilling pitches well, he will very likely have multiple multi-year offers on the table in free agency. </p>
<p>I would love it if you could ask someone in the front office about that possibility.  Because you know very well Rob, that the Red Sox aren&#8217;t going to give him a multi-year deal.  I want to hear someone in the Red Sox org say they&#8217;d be open to a multi-year deal.</p>
<p>Everyone seems to be assuming that Schilling will just want (or accept) a 1-year deal after the season.  It&#8217;s time for you to start bringing attention to the possibility of several multi-year offers that will certainly exist if Schilling pitches well&#8230;. and if the Red Sox will go there. (which we know they won&#8217;t)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2007/02/23/clement-update/#comment-178</link>
		<author>Greg</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.eagletribune.com/sports/2007/02/23/clement-update/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good to hear about Matt Clement - it seems he is at least motivated to become a $9 million pitcher.  At least we know he isn't going to sit on the sideline and collect his check.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;If the closer situation is still unknown in June, I think we'll all be talking about giving him a chance at it, which I think would be a great idea!  He's a ground ball pitcher and though he is infamous for losing composure, it usually only happens after a bad inning.  Derek Lowe is a somewhat similar pitcher and obviously had success in that rols, albeit temporary.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear about Matt Clement - it seems he is at least motivated to become a $9 million pitcher.  At least we know he isn&#8217;t going to sit on the sideline and collect his check.</p>
<p>If the closer situation is still unknown in June, I think we&#8217;ll all be talking about giving him a chance at it, which I think would be a great idea!  He&#8217;s a ground ball pitcher and though he is infamous for losing composure, it usually only happens after a bad inning.  Derek Lowe is a somewhat similar pitcher and obviously had success in that rols, albeit temporary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
