I’ve got no problem with Sen. Barack Obama’s alleged “plagiarism” of our beloved Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick. It’s amusing, in a way, to have the Hillary Clinton campaign be so fiercely concerned with some imagined copyright infringement of Gov. Patrick, since Patrick has endorsed Obama. And according to Patrick, he encouraged Obama to use lines from his “Just words …” speech anyway. No harm, no foul, in other words.
But I have a big problem with the substance of what Patrick said, and what Obama is borrowing.
Patrick was right when he said the phrase, “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal …” was much more than “just words.” But he made himself ridiculous when he then suggested that his slogan, “Together we can” was on a par with those timeless words from the Declaration of Independence. The declaration of equal rights and opportunity means something profound – something worth bleeding and dying to defend. “Together we can” is utterly meaningless, by design. It deliberately leaves out anything specific or of substance. As so many have wondered, “Together we can … what?” And the answer in Massachusetts so far is, “Not much.” They have had little to no meaning. They are, in fact, “just words.”
Same for Obama. Is he trying to pretend that, “Yes we can,” and “Change we can believe in,” belong in the top tier of soaring American political rhetoric? If so, he is more a clown than a serious candidate for president. This stuff belongs on Sesame Street, not the world stage.
And all the women fainting at his campaign events ought to be doing so out of disgust rather than infatuation.