Posts
Comments

If there were any doubts about Andover teachers having a sense of entitlement on the scale of some of the McMansions in town, science teacher Tim Van Wey has removed them. Read his letter to the editor here.
Van Wey objects to a news story here that said the teachers blocked traffic off of Main Street as they slowly marched from Old Town Hall to Superintendent Claudia Bach’s office to protest their lack of a contract. This, he contends, meant the teachers had been “willfully misunderstood.” They weren’t blocking traffic, he insists. They simply “use(d) the crosswalks which grant them the right of way in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.”
Ahh, yes, of course. A crowd of 300 teachers is just like any other pedestrian “using” the crosswalk. Van Wey neglects to mention that two cops had to be called to help alleviate the traffic jam that the teachers caused. He also neglects to mention that the teachers didn’t have to use Main Street - they could easily have walked from Old Town Hall to Bartlet Street a block away, which parallels Main Street and where they could have done their little march without snarling nearly as much traffic. But then, not as many people would have been paying attention to them. And, as you know, it’s all about them, even though they keep reciting like a mantra that it’s all about the children.
Union president Tom Meyers has hauled out the same old line he uses every time the union demands more money - that if they don’t get it, then Andover will lose teachers to the three or four other districts in the state that pay even more. If I were an Andover parent, I’d be begging any teacher who thinks abusing a crosswalk is just “using” a crosswalk to go elsewhere. Please, go teach in Brookline or Newton if they’ll have you. Anywhere but here.

  • bilge rat
    I am no fan of unions. Having belonged to two unions, participating in three strikes, and being a steward for one of them, really turned me against unions.
    The majority of them have outlived their usefulness, promote mediocrity, and penalize hard working individuals who wish to advance their careers in whatever business entity they are working in.
    This is a typical union tactic-draw attention to the cause, no matter what the disruption. However, what the unions have failed to realize over the years is that stunts such as this only irritate the very people whose support they are looking for.
  • bilge rat
    And another thing.....The Andover teachers ought to take a look at the fiasco unfolding in Salem and thank their lucky stars that they aren't in the same boat....

    At least they have jobs.....
  • bilge rat
    Sorry about the rant, folks......
    :-)
  • jacrlsn
    Don't apologize, bilge rat, we need to say it as it is and you do.
    By the way, did you see the facts the other day on the Salem fiasco? I'm not at all trying to say that character doesn't deserve all he's going to get, or should get, but the other side of the story is that before he lied about almost everything,financial, teacher staffing in Salem was about 50% of the maximum pupil /teacher ratio in the contract. This tells me that Salem was employing more teachers than were needed to give the students a good education. The contract called for roughly 28-30 students per teacher and although most school administrators and parents would push for as low as ratio as they could get, 28-30 was about the normal ratio when I was going to public schools in a good town and of course 50+ years ago. I don't know of anyone I went to school with who was poorly educated unless they didn't want to learn.
  • bilge rat
    Hi Jim,

    I have been following the school financial disaster, also. I did read that they are expecting class sizes of 28-30. I have to admit I was surprised to hear how small the class sizes in Salem were before the u-no-what hit the fan.

    On a personal note, we are in the process of looking at high schools for our daughter, and were seriously considering the honors program at Salem High. Now, though, we are pretty set on our second choice, Bishop Fenwick. Although we have lived in Salem for many years, neither of us are originally from Salem. Our concern is not so much class size, but the ability of the school department to run the schools and make smart financial decisions. At this point, we don't feel they can do that. To have let themselves be blindsided by this individual, Bruce Guy, doesn't instill much confidence in us. Especially since it appears this is not his first offense and that there were warning signs.

    Bruce Guy should be prosecuted to the full extent that the law permits.
  • jacrlsn
    bilge rat, you are right. I've never heard bad words about Fenwick and it seems to be insulated from the financial difficulties of the diocesis.
  • Mr. Van Wey objects to the suggestion that the teacher parade through crosswalks was somehow inapproapriate, and he's had his say. What concerns me much more is the last portion of his letter, where he suggests that (1) the Andover public is being misinformed, (2) there is a crisis in education in Andover, (3) Andover public schools have been neglected, and (4) that some evil-doer is "proposing" a damaging level of support for the Andover schools.
    His reference to "proposed level of support" is presumably the estimated school budget which would be available if voters approve a balanced FY09 budget within the constraints of Proposition 2 1/2. If so, then the evil-doers must be the voters of Andover, i.e., the people paying his salary. The total budget, and total number of full-time equivalent employees in the Andover schools has increased in each of the past four years - is this the 'neglect' that he is referring to? Andover is consistently ranked among the finest school districts in the state, with several awards for excellence - and this is a "crisis"? I suspect there are many towns in the state who would be very pleased to have such a crisis to deal with.
blog comments powered by Disqus