Posts
Comments

This would be funny, if the business at hand was not serious.
The primary election process was supposed to be about candidates for each party having several months to woo voters in the various states, in various parts of the country. The theory, which made sense, was that this was the best chance for each party to field its best candidate.
That’s already been gone for a while, with the front-loading of primaries making conventions nothing more than expensive, empty pep rallies.
But now it’s even less about the candidates. It’s all about the egos of political leaders in the various states, who are acting like grade-schoolers trying to elbow their way to the front of the line.
The latest is Michigan, which is considering moving its primary to Jan. 15, which will, of course, mean that New Hampshire will move its primary to at least a week earlier than that and … you get the idea. As multiple pundits have observed, this will lead to primaries right about the time people are trying to celebrate Thanksgiving and Christmas.
So, as long as we’re making a joke out of primaries anyway, how about this modest proposal: Hold ALL the primaries just one week after the new president is inaugurated. Talk about a super-duper Tuesday. And then we’ll have just two people hectoring us, sucking up to us, making us impossible promises for the next four years.

  • http://? warren kelley

    Taylor,

    I love being pissed off by you…You’re a stimulating writer. Keep it up.

    Warren

  • http://none Tom Delaney

    What difference does it make? There isn’t anybody on either side of the aisle that’s worth anything. They are all “Republicrats.”

  • http://SearchSecurity.com Bill Brenner

    Let’s bring back the days when the nominees were selected in smoke-filled rooms during deadlocked conventions. Sure, the people had less say in who got nominated and everything was controlled by the old political bosses, but I’ll bet it was a lot more interesting and fun for reporters to cover than the system we have now. Warren G. Harding was chosen in the smoke-filled room, and from what I can tell, the candidates on both sides today don’t seem much better than he was.

  • Jim Carlson

    The irony of it is that two organizations who our forebears and Constitution did not and do not contemplate are going to give us the choice of who to vote for. The primaries give us some say, but if there is someone out there who wants to run for public office, and does not belong to either party, we will not get a chance to vote for him or her. MR. Delaney is right, there is not much difference between the parties. Mr Amerding is right all they are doing is sucking up to us. What to do? I say a place to start is the incumbents. Vote all of the buggers out. Good or bad, national, state or local.
    Let’s face it, a whole slate of novices couldn’t do any worse than what’s being done. Are we depriving someone of the right to run for office? No, they’re doing that to themselves

blog comments powered by Disqus