Stormy and Big E, and the rest you probably shouldn’t call Paul, Faz, Ricky or anyone out like that unless you have it on tape.
I find it laughable that the officials, and their friends, obviously since you’re all blogging here, whine about the need for a third ref.
Three refs is not the answer. Three refs is just one more person making mistakes out there.
Three refs is an excuse for another incompetent individual to pick up a check.
In this era where athletic departments are strapped, Adding another bloated check won’t help.
Now, if you want the guys in stripes, who are totally overpaid as it is (Are varsity games almost $100 for 90 minutes of work? And they whine about sticking around for the hand shake), to split two fees, three ways, say $65 apiece, I’m all for it.
As long as the cost remains the same, I say let’s have 10 refs, one for each player, maybe that will solve things.
Each guy can make 20 bucks a game.
I get the feeling all you refereeing allies wouldn’t be in for three guys splitting the $200 bucks a game, three ways, just for the betterment of the game.
Gosh, I thought we could avoid this topic all year, but no, you guys keep bringing it up.
Three refs is just building up the herd so that bad officials will get work.
Two guys can bend and yield and nod their heads and take all the guff they do from the coaches because they’re afraid that they will get blackballed come tourney time just as well as three guys can.
Again, since all you officials are so worried out there about the good of the game, take a 1/3 pay cut and bring a buddy along to help.
I’m all for it. But not for a penny more, not from this strapped taxpayer.